Any person who tuned in to the World Cup's opening ceremony eager
to find out specifically what a World Cup opening ceremony is for would have
come away slightly disappointed.
Differently I can say, Olympic opening
ceremonies they are not theoretical to be any type of sign on the host nation.
Indeed, such parochialism would be absolute
frowned upon by today's World Cup attitude, in view of that together the
official anthem and slogan this time round is the classically Fifa-ishly
nonsensical, and distinctly Benetton-esque, "We Are One".
So many believe that the lead singers
of the anthem this year, Pitbull and Jennifer Lopez, look to have been elected
in the strength of this kind of worldwide unanimity.
Seeing neither they are actually Brazilian: Pitbull was born in
the US
to Cuban parents and Lopez, albeit is
also American.
So maybe it's best to believe that the
opening ceremony is best for the World Cup.
Especially on the first day morning of
the tournament's first game, three hundred people gathered on the outside of
the ground to protest against the money lavished on football stadiums as an
alternative of things similar to people and schools.
In the meantime, inside the stadium, Fifa held a consultation clearing
up how their only aim in their modest life was to establish world peace. One
journalist asked with a laudably straight face if they expected to win the word’s
best Nobel harmony award. Fifa seriously measured the prospect. "It goes
beyond football and outside Fifa". In the meantime, information came
through that several journalists had been wounded by police in the objection
through paging the Nobel peace reward commission!
So by the time the opening formal
procedure really began, we could all only expect it would bring us good applaud
and help us to stop having a "thin focus", as the Fifa boot put it,
on dull things like poverty and broaden our scope to football.
No comments:
Post a Comment